also sprach Bjørn Mork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.12.09.1758 +0100]: > > My patch does no "apply", it was made against 2.6.26-11 -- > > Supermicro just sent me their forcedeth.c and I made the patch. > > Probably against the unpatched 2.6.26 then? OK, that will explain the > similarities. But then the real problem must be something else. Sorry > for the confusion.
No, I made it against 2.6.26-11, for no other reason that it was in Debian unstable at the time, and I had given up hope for targetting lenny before. I'd be happy to create a patch against -10 instead. > > How do I find out when net-use-gso.patch was added? The changelog > > does not mention it, and I cannot find a repository for the source > > (there are also no Vcs-* links in the package). > > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26-11/changelog#versionversion2.6.26-2 > > has a > > * net: use software GSO for SG+CSUM capable netdevices (Lennert Buytenhek) > > line, which matches the subject in the patch. Alright. I admit I didn't look that closely. Isn't there a Git repo for Debian kernels? -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "she was rather too intelligent and competent-looking to be considered entirely beautiful, but all the more attractive because of it." -- george spencer-brown, "a lion's teeth"
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)