On Wednesday 01 April 2009, maximilian attems wrote: > On Wed, 01 Apr 2009, maximilian attems wrote: > > what be cool would be to have it use debhelper instead of the > > dpkg call.
I disagree. deb-pkg only creates a two binary packages. It's not a "normal" package build process at all and the direct dpkg call is perfectly suited for that. Also: - the lack of orig.tgz would probably break debhelper/dpkg-buildpackage anyway - using debhelper would probably imply running a clean target and that's one of the reasons why I very much prefer deb-pkg over make-kpkg: build times with deb-pkg are significantly lower > also a linux header and linux-libc-dev package creation. I've had that thought as well, but please as a _separate_ build target (or somehow optional). Same maybe for a -doc package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
