Your message dated Tue, 8 Sep 2009 22:02:43 +0200
with message-id <20090908200243.gc19...@inutil.org>
and subject line Re: kernel: general protection fault: 0000 [1] SMP
has caused the Debian Bug report #409806,
regarding kernel: general protection fault: 0000 [1] SMP
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
409806: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=409806
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: kernel
Version: 2.6.18-3-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Dec 4 17:04:37 CET 2006 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Severity: normal
While using a debian ethc system in an usual way:
the following two lines happend:
Message from sysl...@computername at Mon Feb 5 18:08:22 2007 ...
simi kernel: general protection fault: 0000 [1] SMP
This deals with
2.6.18-3-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Dec 4 17:04:37 CET 2006 x86_64 GNU/Linux
:~$ lsmod
Module Size Used by
smbfs 69648 2
ext2 70288 0
udf 81416 1
radeon 116384 2
drm 87080 3 radeon
nfsd 256200 17
exportfs 10368 1 nfsd
button 12192 0
ac 10376 0
battery 15496 0
ipv6 285664 49
nfs 236216 3
lockd 67600 3 nfsd,nfs
nfs_acl 8320 2 nfsd,nfs
sunrpc 166984 13 nfsd,nfs,lockd,nfs_acl
sk98lin 146656 0
dm_snapshot 20536 0
dm_mirror 25216 0
dm_mod 62800 2 dm_snapshot,dm_mirror
sbp2 28680 0
loop 20112 0
tsdev 13056 0
snd_hda_intel 23708 1
snd_hda_codec 184192 1 snd_hda_intel
snd_pcm_oss 48672 0
snd_mixer_oss 21888 1 snd_pcm_oss
i2c_i801 13076 0
snd_pcm 88968 3 snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_pcm_oss
parport_pc 41640 0
parport 44684 1 parport_pc
psmouse 44432 0
snd_timer 29192 1 snd_pcm
i2c_core 27776 1 i2c_i801
serio_raw 12036 0
pcspkr 7808 0
shpchp 42156 0
pci_hotplug 20872 1 shpchp
snd 65256 8
snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_pcm_oss,snd_mixer_oss,snd_pcm,snd_timer
soundcore 15392 1 snd
snd_page_alloc 14864 2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm
evdev 15360 1
sky2 46212 0
eth1394 24840 0
ext3 138256 6
jbd 65392 1 ext3
mbcache 14216 2 ext2,ext3
ide_cd 45088 1
cdrom 40488 1 ide_cd
sd_mod 25856 7
generic 10756 0 [permanent]
usbhid 45088 0
ata_piix 19976 0
libata 106784 1 ata_piix
ohci1394 38216 0
ieee1394 361976 3 sbp2,eth1394,ohci1394
aacraid 63616 6
scsi_mod 152880 4 sbp2,sd_mod,libata,aacraid
skge 43536 0
piix 15492 0 [permanent]
ide_core 147584 3 ide_cd,generic,piix
uhci_hcd 28432 0
ehci_hcd 36104 0
thermal 20240 0
processor 38248 1 thermal
fan 9864 0
this happend trying some zip commands, from local drive to udf
filesystem removable Iomega drive, working with /dev/hda.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.6.24-1
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 02:28:09AM +0200, Jean-Michel wrote:
> I observed this error with etch, in 2007.
>
> Due to issues with 2.6.18, I switched to 2.6.24, some time ago (might be
> one or two years).
>
> Since then I did not observe any error related to UDF filesystem (except
> one windows incompatibility documented in another bug report).
Thanks, marking as closed.
Cheers,
Moritz
--- End Message ---