On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote: > This became a discussion about the general kernel packaging and how we > might use the upstream provided facilities better. There was some > discussion we have way too many ways to build a kernel. > > A general agreement was reached that "make-kpkg" should go away as > it is no longer adequately maintained. Action item for Vince to tell > Manoj it is deprecated and thank him for his contribution.
What will be the recommended way to package locally built kernels in a .deb? At the moment, it looks like kernel-package will be a real loss for Debian users. Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 3221 2323190 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
