Hi Martin, On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 04:56:17PM +0000, Martin Waite wrote: > Hi Guido, > > I have abandoned using RHCS on Debian Stable. RHCS 2 in Fedora and > Centos do not have the bug, and unfortunately in my production > environment I will be tied to using RHCS 2. > > I do believe that the bug has gone away in version 3 of RHCS, but > version 2 of RHCS as supplied by Lenny is virtually useless: it > cannot handle failover. > > As a newcomer to using RHCS, it took a few days to figure out that the > problems I was having were not caused by my configuration errors (of > which I had many) but were actually caused by a bug. > > Is there some way of either removing the package or providing some > warning to potential users that it doesn't work ? Marking the bug as > closed seems inappropriate because it implies that the bug has been > resolved - which is not true. Would "wont fix" be better ? The bug is fixed in RHCS 3.0.2 so closing it is apropriate. I wouldn't object to remove RHCS 2 from Lenny though since I never got anything to work with RHCS2 either (neither rgmanager nor gfs). I'm cc'ing the maintainers of the RHCS2 package in Lenny. Is there anybody really using RHCS 2 in Lenny in production? If not we should remove it. Cheers, -- Guido
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
