Dear Paul, On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 10:02:47PM +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote: > > > I now tried that (not with apt-get but manually). I guess I needed the > files: > > .../pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26.orig.tar.gz > .../pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26-21.diff.gz > > (please confirm, or tell me what I messed up). After unpacking those, > I find (essentially in the diff file) the
as told in seperate mail that is outdated, as 2.6.32 is current dev. > .../linux-2.6-2.6.26/debian/templates/temp.image.plain/ > > directory. However, to my surprise, those files are older than those > from the kernel-package directory, for example: > > diff -r /usr/share/kernel-package/pkg/image/postinst > linux-2.6-2.6.26/debian/templates/temp.image.plain/postinst > 8,10c8,10 > < # Last Modified On : Wed Oct 8 00:03:41 2008 > < # Last Machine Used: anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com > < # Update Count : 360 > --- > > # Last Modified On : Fri Sep 29 10:08:18 2006 > > # Last Machine Used: glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com > > # Update Count : 357 > ... well those lines have no other meanings as that they share a common ancestor, they have been changed a lot since. also 2.6.32 files have no longer those comments. > Does that mean that kernel-package is in fact newer, and you should > "import" again then use my patches (sent previously)? > > ----- > > Should this bug somehow be "given" to kernel-package also (clone and > reassign?): would you be able to do that? don't know kernel-package is in slow maintenance, better have linux-2.6 fixed. but saw your old patch and can do that later tomorrow. thanks for your input. kind regards maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
