Hi Maximilian If you want any help on this, please let me know and I'll help as much as I can.
I can help with anything, but I think most likely the following is suitable: * Testing kernel when built * Checking rejects * Fixing potential build issues. Best regards, // Ola On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 08:58:14PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 09:29:50PM +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote: > > > > We now have the tree which is more or less working (with > > some known and unknown bugs). It is available as > > > > git: > > git://git.openvz.org/pub/linux-2.6.32-openvz > > http://git.openvz.org/pub/linux-2.6.32-openvz > > > > gitweb: > > http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.32-openvz;a=summary > > thanks saw it. > get a bunch of fails on 2.6.32.9 base, could you merge in > 2.6.32 stable release or rebase on top of 2.6.32.9 > > on the run currently had no time to check the failures > (patch need to apply with zero fuzz) > > > > Has anything changed since then? Do we get the Debian kernel from svn? > > no nothing changed since. > yes. > > > Another question -- in what form do you like to see our work -- i.e. git > > tree, > > git tree is the best, can extract patch from that. > > don't know yet about the handling of the stable tree, > typicaly external patches have some rejects with it, > so it be probably the coolest if you'd merge that in? > > > set of patches applicable to your kernel, anything else? > > > thanks > > -- --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology ---- / o...@inguza.com Annebergsslingan 37 \ | o...@debian.org 654 65 KARLSTAD | | http://inguza.com/ Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100309201324.gb26...@inguza.net
