Le lundi 2 août 2010 00:27:10, vous avez écrit :
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 11:58:36AM -0500, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
> > Package: lm-sensors
> > Severity: normal
> >
> >
> > This looks like a consequence of a recent change in kernel policy
> > regarding resource conflicts. According to the 'kernel-parameters.txt'
> > file in the kernel documentation, the default value of the parameter
> > "acpi_enforce_resources" has changed:
> >
> > $ grep -A 15 acpi_enforce_resources Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> >
> > acpi_enforce_resources= [ACPI]
> >
> > { strict | lax | no }
> > Check for resource conflicts between native drivers
> > and ACPI OperationRegions (SystemIO and SystemMemory
> > only). IO ports and memory declared in ACPI might be
> > used by the ACPI subsystem in arbitrary AML code and
> > can interfere with legacy drivers.
> > strict (default): access to resources claimed by ACPI
> > is denied; legacy drivers trying to access reserved
> > resources will fail to bind to device using them.
> > lax: access to resources claimed by ACPI is allowed;
> > legacy drivers trying to access reserved resources
> > will bind successfully but a warning message is logged.
> > no: ACPI OperationRegions are not marked as reserved,
> > no further checks are performed.
> >
> > I recently resolved a very similar issue myself by adding
> > "acpi_enforce_resources=lax" to my kernel boot line in GRUB.
>
> Didier, does this fix the issue for you?
>
> Cheers,
> Moritz
Hi Moritz,
yes it does. But if this option is to stay, it really should get either i) set
automagically by <insert smart package name here> ii) documented visibly in
release notes maybe ?
Thanks for your following-up on that bug.
Cheers, OdyX
--
Didier Raboud, proud Debian Maintainer (DM).
CH-1020 Renens
did...@raboud.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201008051730.09081.did...@raboud.com
