* Sam Vilain <sam.vil...@catalyst.net.nz> [Thu Sep 30, 2010 at 10:56:18AM +1300]:
> aufs is an out-of-tree project, and this presents considerable > management challenges. For instance, current the Linux kernel in > experimental has no aufs module. > Given that compared to tmpfs, aufs is used primarily to save RAM, it > should be reasonable to fall back on tmpfs for creating writable > filesystem spaces during boot. > If I were to come up with a patch to the various scripts which support > graceful fallback to tmpfs, would it be possible to include it ? initramfs-tools doesn't care about aufs at all, do you mean live-initramfs/live-boot instead? regards, -mika-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature