Hi, On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote: [...] >> >> I would not expect to see any header if there is no new symbol(s). >> >> However, that might complicate the code too much. Btw, I find >> >> "Changes" to be misleading, is that header necessary ? >> > >> > We use this feature (or an earlier version of it) in automated kernel >> > builds in Debian, so we expect the output to appear in build logs and >> > the header makes it easier to pick out. >> > >> That's easily doable outside kconfig. > > No it isn't, as the Kconfig code must be built as part of the > listnewconfig target. (Building just the code first will provoke > warnings about the invalid config.) > echo "#" echo "# Changes:" echo "#" make [...] listnewconfig
does the job, without introducing extra header others do not seem to want to see. - Arnaud -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimtz=ate6fl-+hdniwwo256yuaqejyopwrth...@mail.gmail.com
