On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 09:51 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 06:51:36AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I want to apply this to squeeze.  I've seen one too many panics with
> > VMware or VirtualBox modules in them, which appear to be worse than
> > anything in drivers/staging.
> 
> Don't forget to add it to the bug script.
> 
> > +   intree = get_modinfo(sechdrs, infoindex, "intree");
> > +   if (!intree)
> > +           add_taint_module(mod, TAINT_OOT_MODULE);
> 
> Is there a reason for not doing this the following way except that you
> copied the staging check?

Exactly.

> |     if (!get_modinfo(sechdrs, infoindex, "intree"))
> |             add_taint_module(mod, TAINT_OOT_MODULE);
> 
> The resulting code should be the same[1]. And actually the staging test
> looks this way in .37.

So, should I go ahead with this (trunk now, maybe squeeze later)?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1295844272.12300.8.camel@localhost

Reply via email to