On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 05:43:02PM +0100, rleigh wrote: > severity 621803 important > tags 621803 + patch > thanks > > On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 03:08:37AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > Package: initramfs-tools > > Version: 0.98.8+45+g08fbe1e-1 > > Severity: normal > > User: rle...@debian.org > > Usertags: run-transition > > > > Hi maks, > > > > we already talked about this and you already started implementing /run > > support in initramfs-tools [1], so this is merely a bug to keep track > > of this transition [2]. > > I didn't see a patch in git, so I've attached a simple one here. > This creates /run as a tmpfs, and moves the mount to the rootfs > /run as done for other filesystems.
please look harder next times! the git archive, don't know where you looked, so here it is: http://git.debian.org/?p=kernel/initramfs-tools.git;a=summary checkout the branch maks/run > If this is all that is needed in the main initramfs, will it > take long to get the /run support into unstable? It looks like > this might be a prerequisite for a fully functional udev, and > for other tools that store state in the initramfs, and it's a > simple and safe change to make. I've raised the severity due > to the /run transition being dependent on this being fixed. there is *no* point in posting trivial patches round and round. if you'd build i-t with that branch and have it *well* tested in several different configuration, then that would be a help. currently this /run thingy seems like a useless mass_panic(). happy hacking -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110418175807.gb13...@vostochny.stro.at