On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 02:53:58PM +0000, maximilian attems wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:47:55AM -0500, Tarek Soliman wrote: > > > A list of commits would have been sufficient. ;-) > > > > I just realized that the current patchset is actually missing the > > commit SHA1's because they are a patchset off of cherry-picked > > commits off of a branch of the tag v2.6.39. > > > > Here's how I got them: > > > > git revlist --no-merges v2.6.39..master -- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/ > > where master is eb96c925152fc289311e5d7e956b919e9b60ab53 > > > > I created a branch off of v2.6.39 and cherry-picked those commits into it. > > A couple of them conflicted so I skipped those ones. > > > > I then created this patchset which I applied to the debian source > > version 2.6.39-2 > > > > In hindsight, I should have cherry-picked with -x > > we won't backport this huge set of changes to a linux-2.6 we don't release > with.
Of course not. I am happy with what I have. This was for others who want to do the same. > please use 3.0-rcX from experimental, i'll marked it fixed with soon to be > accepted > rc4 upload. Thanks I didn't realize that existed. I should have probably started with that instead of trying to roll my own. -- Tarek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110621150412.GA16491@zeus.olympus
