On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:50:11PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > 1. Installer team members (initially Otavio, Joey and Colin) will need > commit access, to update the module selections for udebs.
As long as they don't break it, well. > 2. The automatic inclusion of module dependencies sometimes results in a > module being selected for multiple packages. kernel-wedge does not > attempt to resolve this, and treats it as a fatal error. It should be > turned into a warning when building linux-2.6 for experimental. I don't see a way to detect that from the source. > He is wary about this because currently the > explicit lists of modules provide a useful check that modules have not > been unexpectedly removed. (This sometimes happens due to introduction > of new kconfig variables without sane defaults.) We need to check for > this in some way. Did this problem break hell loose in the past? I can't remember anything. However we could make this part of the ABI, which we check anyway. > 4. kernel-wedge must remain a separate package, as it is also used for > the FreeBSD kernel. Well. I don't see much that would survive. The control generation and the module selection is not. Bastian -- Violence in reality is quite different from theory. -- Spock, "The Cloud Minders", stardate 5818.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110728113926.ga31...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org