On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:17:24 -0400, Dave Jones <da...@redhat.com> wrote: > commit 7816c45bf13255157c00fb8aca86cb64d825e878 > Author: Roland Vossen <rvos...@broadcom.com> > Date: Thu Apr 7 11:20:58 2011 +0200 > > modules: Enabled dynamic debugging for staging modules ... > > Signed-off-by: Roland Vossen <rvos...@broadcom.com> > Acked-by: Jason Baron <jba...@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@suse.de>
Greg, you know better. This is why we have maintainers: I can't track patches I don't see. Grrr... > If we want to support out of tree modules with this, should we just nuke the > whole check, or do we still want to prevent certain types of tainted kernels > from using this stuff ? It goes back to the first implementation of kernel markers. IIRC, it was to prevent dynamic debug stuff from circumventing licensing, but testing for *any* taint seems overbroad. Mathieu? Thanks, Rusty. PS. Can't see how this related to lockdep either... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87zkgoo09f....@rustcorp.com.au
