On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:35:16 +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2012, 11:29:57 schrieb Markus Kolb:
Is it really a broken union descriptor?
There is all information but the original cdc_ether code can only
handle union descriptor which starts with 0.
That is something e.g. the Windows driver can handle.
Possibly cdc-ether is also broken, but the descriptor refers to
interfaces
4 and 5 which don't exist.
Regards
Oliver
Ok. You're right, I've reminded.
Is there another way to get the correct interface numbers or is the
defensive guess of my patch ok?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/b251fc2844669dd6e0f8034147156...@mail.net4visions.de
