Hi, John Johansen wrote (13 Mar 2012 16:33:53 GMT) : > sorry I missed this,
Thank you, John, for your answers :) > yes you can pull them out of the tarball, That would be 0002-AppArmor-compatibility-patch-for-v5-interface.patch that can be found in the kernel-patches/$LATEST/ directory of the apparmor Debian source package. Given $LATEST == 3.1 currently, see bellow for the Ubuntu patches that were maybe refreshed. John, do you confirm this patch does not depend on any of the two others? (namely: 0001-AppArmor-compatibility-patch-for-v5-network-controll.patch and 0003-AppArmor-Allow-dfa-backward-compatibility-with-broke.patch) > or from the ubuntu kernel tree. I guess that would be http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-precise.git;a=commit;h=56f928f0cbf810c047a9a72e4e5c4840800437ec John, please correct me if I did not guess right. > There are also a new set of patches available against the 3.3 > kernel. The static parts of the interface have been updated and > pushed into the 3.4 kernel. And the goal is to get the other part > into the 3.5 kernel (still a wip). John: I guess the Linux 3.2 kernel shipped in Precise will carry those patches, and this is why the v5 compat' patches got recently reverted in Precise's kernel tree, right? > Though those will require a more recent userspace. John: that will be called 2.8, right? Regards, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/857gynbhu2....@boum.org