On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 01:42:32AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 10:27 +0100, Harald Jenny wrote: > > Dear kernel team, > > > > I do not really consider this a valid request currently as upstream is > > not actively persuing (at least now) integration of the SARef changes in > > the main kernel (at least to my knowledge). Either this bug should be > > closed or reassigned as a minor wishlist bug to openswan which will be > > reassigned to the kernel again when upstream openswan and upstream > > kernel get to a decision (just my opinion as openswan debian uploader > > and openswan upstream commiter). > > There is no need to close this. I have marked this as upstream > wishlist, and we basically leave submitters to make the case for such > requests with upstream themselves. You could create/clone a wishlist > bug in openswan and mark it blocked by this. > > Ben. > > -- > Ben Hutchings > The program is absolutely right; therefore, the computer must be wrong.
Sorry for the long delay on this issue, mail went to wrong folder, will do this now... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121126110015.ga6...@harald-has.a-little-linux-box.at
