Dear Ben,

>>>> PAE is broken for any amount of RAM.
>>> No it isn't.
>> Could I please ask you to expand on that?
>
> I already did, a few messages back.

OK, thanks. Noting however that fewer than those back, I said:
  ... PAE with any RAM fails the "sleep test":
  n=0; while [ $n -lt 33000 ]; do sleep 600 & ((n=n+1)); done
and somewhere also said that non-PAE passes. Does not that prove
that PAE is broken?

Cheers, Paul

Paul Szabo   p...@maths.usyd.edu.au   http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics   University of Sydney    Australia


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/201302010313.r113dtj3027...@como.maths.usyd.edu.au

Reply via email to