On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 09:48:19PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (27 Jun 2012 11:00:22 GMT) : > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 04:32:31AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > >> Yes, but I think it would make more sense to emulate a USB storage > >> device in qemu rather than the host kernel. > > I do agree. > > bertagaz and I have spent a bit more time testing and comparing the > available options. Our results are summed up there: > https://tails.boum.org/todo/automated_builds_and_tests/USB/ > > tl;dr --> as far as Wheezy is concerned: > * qemu-kvm emulates just fine a USB 2.0 mass storage device, and > knows how to boot from it; personally, I'd rather use that than > a dedicated kernel module. > * with qemu-kvm on the command-line: no need for an additional > kernel module > * with a libvirt stack: a missing interface in some abstraction > layer makes it a pain to use the qemu-kvm USB emulation of > removable mass storage devices.
How's the state of affairs with libvirt 1.1 from unstable? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130708162252.GA6647@pisco.westfalen.local