On 2014-02-02 02:27, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sat, 2014-02-01 at 08:01 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: >> On 2014-02-01 02:36, Daigo Moriwaki wrote: >>> Hi team, >>> >> >> Hi, >> >>> [...] >> >> Until yesterday, it was not possible for us to move forward with the >> libunwind transition. We have been forced to ask maintainers of reverse >> dependencies to keep using libunwind7-dev to ensure their packages could >> migrate to testing. Therefore, there are still some uses of >> libunwind7{,-dev} that we need to clean up before libunwind can migrate. >> To my knowledge that includes at least: >> >> """ >> gcc-3.3: libunwind7-dev (>= 0.98.5-1) > > There is no such dependency in the version in testing. > >> gcc-4.4: libunwind7-dev (>= 0.98.5-6) >> gcc-4.6: libunwind7-dev (>= 0.98.5-6) >> gcc-4.7: libunwind7-dev (>= 0.98.5-6) >> gcc-4.8: libunwind7-dev (>= 0.98.5-6) >> gcc-snapshot: libunwind7-dev (>= 0.98.5-6) >> gcj-4.6: libunwind7-dev (>= 0.98.5-6) >> gdb: libunwind7-dev >> gdb-msp430: libunwind7-dev >> gnat-4.4: libunwind7-dev (>= 0.98.5-6) >> gnat-4.6: libunwind7-dev (>= 0.98.5-6) >> gnat-4.8: libunwind7-dev (>= 0.98.5-6) > > These build-depend on libunwind7-dev only on ia64. >
Indeed, I got tricked by dak saying there was, but it is a "[ia64]"-only dependency. Though gdb-msp430 seems to depend on libunwind8-dev - not sure how I got that on the list. >> julia: libunwind7-dev > > Has already been updated. > Yes, the maintainer was kind enough to mail Daigo and I when that happened. >> linux-tools: libunwind7-dev >> """ >> >> I have CC'ed the relevant maintainers,so they can fix their packages. > [...] > > If my understanding is right, the transition can be completed quickly > once linux-tools is updated. Please confirm whether this is the case. > Apparently, I missed google-perftools. But fortunately, Daigo seems to have taken care of that in sid. > Otherwise, as upstream support for Linux 3.12 will end soon, I would > prefer to get 3.13 into testing before making a change which could > result in linux-tools waiting a long time. > > Ben. > Noted. I believe your assertion to be correct and that only linux-tools need an upload. From there linux-tools, google-perftools and julia need to migrate to testing and we should be done. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52ee1867.2020...@thykier.net