On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 09:30:41PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 21:23 +0000, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 08:14:31PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 20:11 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 15:48 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > > The other question is whether there will be any more updates to the > > > > > Squeeze kernel at all, aren't we into security fixes only mode for > > > > > Squeeze by now? > > > > > > > > A regression due to a security fix is also a valid reason for a further > > > > security update. > > > > > > Ah, I'd forgotten that was why this was. I'll try and take a look but > > > I'm travelling for the next ~10 days. > > > > > > > Given the simplicity of the patch I can provide trivial backport as > > well. However it would probably take more time for me to familiarize > > with Debian's workflow than to actually backport the patch! :-) > > If you are interested in how the Debian kernel is put together and want > to take a stab at it I'd be happy to advise etc, but if not I'll just > take care of it myself. I'll assume not unless you say otherwise... >
I took a stab but couldn't get it to work. So I guess you need to take care of it then. Wei. > Ian. > > > > > Wei. > > > > > Is there a bug # for this issue separate from the already closed backend > > > one? > > > > > > Ian. > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140224225417.gb18...@zion.uk.xensource.com