Hi, maximilian attems wrote (12 Mar 2015 20:52:04 GMT) : > Apparmor is not critical, hence it is not a regression blocker.
Sure, I didn't expect this to be a blocker. Thanks, anyway, for making it clear :) > Better check how it affects Selinux while you'd care about security! Sorry, I have no experience with SELinux, and have personally chosen to work on improving AppArmor support on Debian a few years ago, so I won't be the one who takes care of SELinux vs. overlayfs. Now, it may be that the way SELinux works (labelling files) has less chances to be affected by overlayfs than a path-based MAC such as AppArmor. Cheers, -- intrigeri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/85h9tpxn41....@boum.org