On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 05:22:10PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > > Filter on message ID then. > > It does not work, because Cc: and Bcc: are faster then the List-Message > and because I have seperatet folders, my List-Messages will never reach > the Folder and I have a broken Archive.
Two different things. You use the message id to catch duplicates. The for filtering into mailboxes -- some mail boxes I filter by To: or Cc: header for the list and then all messages, even ones that come directly to me via a cc: go to that list. Other lists I filter on a header added by the list server. Then, if the CC codes in first, I get that in my inbox. For many, but not all, their mail directly to me is faster than the list. But I have no control over that. > > One is that some lists I'm on have a delay -- it's been a while but > > d-u has had periods of hours of delay. So the cc allows a response to > > Are you sure ? - I get the messages in less the 15 seconds back. > OK, maybe because I am subscribed to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Sometimes the list is slow. There's been times when hours go by before I see a response. Some of the gnu.org lists are that way too once in a while. Yes, normally they are very fast. > And what, if I do not check my "private" folder and waiting > for a List-Reply for what I chech this Mailbox regulary ? Why is that a concern of anyone else? > IF I WANT CCs, because there is something of > urgence then I set Mail-Followup-To: too. Good. And hope they respect it. How much time do you want to spend trying to get the rest of the on-line world to follow your wishes? If you don't want duplicates then filter them out. -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
