debian-legal  

Messages by Thread

• Legality of src:console-cyrillic (claims "public domain" but I don't think this can be done in the Russian Federation and Kazachstan)? наб
• Request for Evaluation of Lachesis Open License PEPPÈ Santarsiero
  • Re: Request for Evaluation of Lachesis Open License Soren Stoutner
  • R: Request for Evaluation of Lachesis Open License PEPPÈ Santarsiero
  • Re: R: Request for Evaluation of Lachesis Open License Xavier
  • Re: R: Request for Evaluation of Lachesis Open License Michael Stehmann
  • Re: Request for Evaluation of Lachesis Open License Michael Stehmann
  • Re: Request for Evaluation of Lachesis Open License Marc Haber
  • Re: Request for Evaluation of Lachesis Open License Francesco Poli
  • Proposal for the Lachesis Open License as a Framework for Software Freedom PEPPÈ Santarsiero
  • Re: Proposal for the Lachesis Open License as a Framework for Software Freedom Michael Stehmann
  • Re: Proposal for the Lachesis Open License as a Framework for Software Freedom Daniel Hakimi
  • Re: Request for Evaluation of Lachesis Open License Florian Weimer
  • Re: Request for Evaluation of Lachesis Open License Daniel Hakimi
• Re: Question about license Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Question about license Gunnar Wolf
  • Re: Question about license Walter Landry
• Frequent downloads Byrne John
  • Re: Frequent downloads Jonathan Carter
• None FLOSS license for a logo? c . buhtz
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Roberto A. Foglietta
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? c . buhtz
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Simon McVittie
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? c . buhtz
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Daniel Hakimi
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? c . buhtz
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Daniel Hakimi
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Roberto A. Foglietta
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Roberto A. Foglietta
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Soren Stoutner
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Roberto A. Foglietta
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Soren Stoutner
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Roberto A. Foglietta
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Soren Stoutner
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Roberto A. Foglietta
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Roberto A. Foglietta
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Roberto A. Foglietta
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? c . buhtz
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Roberto A. Foglietta
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? c . buhtz
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Roberto A. Foglietta
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? c . buhtz
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Roberto A. Foglietta
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? c . buhtz
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Simon McVittie
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? c . buhtz
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Simon McVittie
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Roberto A. Foglietta
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Ulrich Mueller
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Roberto A. Foglietta
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Mihai Moldovan
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? c . buhtz
  • Re: None FLOSS license for a logo? Francesco Poli
• How to handle GPL-2 and GPL-2+ code in same upstream repo situation? Vasyl Gello
  • Re: How to handle GPL-2 and GPL-2+ code in same upstream repo situation? Santiago Vila
  • Re: Re: How to handle GPL-2 and GPL-2+ code in same upstream repo situation? Vasyl Gello
  • Re: Re: How to handle GPL-2 and GPL-2+ code in same upstream repo situation? Vasyl Gello
  • Re: How to handle GPL-2 and GPL-2+ code in same upstream repo situation? Santiago Vila
• Allegedly "open source" fonts and the DFSG Pip Cet
  • Re: Allegedly "open source" fonts and the DFSG Felipe Sanches
  • Re: Allegedly "open source" fonts and the DFSG Pip Cet
  • Re: Allegedly "open source" fonts and the DFSG Felipe Sanches
  • Re: Allegedly "open source" fonts and the DFSG Felipe Sanches
  • Re: Allegedly "open source" fonts and the DFSG Felipe Sanches
  • Re: Allegedly "open source" fonts and the DFSG Nathan Willis
• Question about BuSL / transform-on-time licenses Joe Brockmeier
  • Re: Question about BuSL / transform-on-time licenses Sam Hartman
• compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Serafeim Zanikolas
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Serafeim Zanikolas
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Francesco Poli
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Serafeim Zanikolas
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Francesco Poli
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Serafeim Zanikolas
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Francesco Poli
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Nicholas D Steeves
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Serafeim Zanikolas
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Francesco Poli
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Serafeim Zanikolas
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Francesco Poli
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Serafeim Zanikolas
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Francesco Poli
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Serafeim Zanikolas
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Francesco Poli
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Francesco Poli
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Serafeim Zanikolas
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Serafeim Zanikolas
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Nicholas D Steeves
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Francesco Poli
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Serafeim Zanikolas
  • Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses Nicholas D Steeves
• Request for feedback: licensing a public specification Nathan Willis
  • Re: Request for feedback: licensing a public specification Simon McVittie
  • Re: Request for feedback: licensing a public specification Francesco Poli
• Compatibility of LGPL-3+ and LGPL-2.1 in same library. Arun Kumar Pariyar
  • Re: Compatibility of LGPL-3+ and LGPL-2.1 in same library. Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Compatibility of LGPL-3+ and LGPL-2.1 in same library. Andreas Metzler
• Updating the PHP license Ben Ramsey
  • Re: Updating the PHP license Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: Updating the PHP license Francesco Poli
  • Re: Updating the PHP license Ben Ramsey
  • Re: Updating the PHP license Richard Laager
  • Re: Updating the PHP license Ben Ramsey
  • Re: Updating the PHP license Francesco Poli
  • Re: Updating the PHP license Ben Ramsey
  • Re: Updating the PHP license Ben Ramsey
  • Re: Updating the PHP license Francesco Poli
  • Re: Updating the PHP license Ben Ramsey
  • Re: Updating the PHP license Francesco Poli
  • Re: Updating the PHP license Ben Ramsey
• Re: Re: LGPLv2+ depending on (LGPLv3+ or GPLv2+) Con Trung Nhỏ
• Request for Permission to Use Logo for Merchandise Rodrigo Vega Cruz
  • Re: Request for Permission to Use Logo for Merchandise Walter Landry
  • Re: Request for Permission to Use Logo for Merchandise Rodrigo Vega Cruz
  • Re: Request for Permission to Use Logo for Merchandise Walter Landry
  • Re: Request for Permission to Use Logo for Merchandise Daniel Lange
• Missing copyright clause of debian directory Xiyue Deng
  • Re: Missing copyright clause of debian directory Richard Laager
  • Re: Missing copyright clause of debian directory Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Missing copyright clause of debian directory Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Missing copyright clause of debian directory Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Missing copyright clause of debian directory Xiyue Deng
  • Re: Missing copyright clause of debian directory Nicholas D Steeves
  • Re: Missing copyright clause of debian directory Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Missing copyright clause of debian directory Nicholas D Steeves
  • Re: Missing copyright clause of debian directory Xiyue Deng
  • Re: Missing copyright clause of debian directory Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Missing copyright clause of debian directory Xiyue Deng
  • Re: Missing copyright clause of debian directory Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Missing copyright clause of debian directory Xiyue Deng
  • Re: Missing copyright clause of debian directory Xiyue Deng
• Files with unknown license Håvard F . Aasen
• Allan Rey Quiban allanrey...@networkingluxurymasterpiece.vom Allan Rey Quiban
• Unieważnieniem umów kredytowych CHF Kamil Bodak
• Another 2-clause BSD or a mistake? David da Silva Polverari
  • Re: Another 2-clause BSD or a mistake? Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Another 2-clause BSD or a mistake? Charles Plessy
• Discover innovative educational tools. Edric Croke
• "freenginx" open source package and "nginx" from F5 open source, potential conflict? Thomas Ward
  • Re: "freenginx" open source package and "nginx" from F5 open source, potential conflict? Richard Laager
  • Re: "freenginx" open source package and "nginx" from F5 open source, potential conflict? Michael Lustfield
  • Re: Re: "freenginx" open source package and "nginx" from F5 open source, potential conflict? Thomas Ward
• Meeting with the Development Team Ray Galt
• FreeSWITCH license analysis Guillem Jover
  • Re: FreeSWITCH license analysis Richard Laager
• XZ upstream thinks about switching from PD to 0BSD. Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
  • Re: XZ upstream thinks about switching from PD to 0BSD. Daniel Hakimi
• hard linking libboost copyright files Muhammad Yaaseen
  • Re: hard linking libboost copyright files Steve Langasek
  • RE: hard linking libboost copyright files Muhammad Yaaseen
  • Re: hard linking libboost copyright files Steve Langasek
  • Re: hard linking libboost copyright files Andreas Metzler
  • Re: hard linking libboost copyright files Andreas Metzler
  • Re: hard linking libboost copyright files Walter Landry
  • RE: hard linking libboost copyright files Muhammad Yaaseen
  • Re: hard linking libboost copyright files Giovanni Mascellani
• d/copyright for source having MPL-2.0 + "adaptation from ..." Fab Stz
• Ihre Eintragung in unseren Newsletter operations
• TrueType/OpenType and anti-circumvention laws P. J. McDermott
  • Re: TrueType/OpenType and anti-circumvention laws P. J. McDermott
  • Re: TrueType/OpenType and anti-circumvention laws P. J. McDermott
  • Re: TrueType/OpenType and anti-circumvention laws Paul Wise
  • Re: TrueType/OpenType and anti-circumvention laws Walter Landry
  • Re: TrueType/OpenType and anti-circumvention laws P. J. McDermott
  • Re: TrueType/OpenType and anti-circumvention laws Florian Weimer
  • Re: TrueType/OpenType and anti-circumvention laws Paul Wise
  • Re: TrueType/OpenType and anti-circumvention laws P. J. McDermott
• d/copyright entries for licenses and copyright data Ross Vandegrift
  • Re: d/copyright entries for licenses and copyright data Richard Laager
  • Re: d/copyright entries for licenses and copyright data Ross Vandegrift
  • Re: d/copyright entries for licenses and copyright data Paul Wise
  • Re: d/copyright entries for licenses and copyright data Ross Vandegrift
  • Re: d/copyright entries for licenses and copyright data Paul Wise
  • Re: d/copyright entries for licenses and copyright data Ross Vandegrift
• Sikeres regisztráció HolnemBolt JátékGaléria Djeco mintabolt . Játékban a művészet!
• Nowy ustawa dla firm Mikołaj Niszkowski
• Bug#1053672: Apple copyright notices in test .xlsx files Rebecca N. Palmer
  • Re: Bug#1053672: Apple copyright notices in test .xlsx files Paul Wise
  • Bug#1053672: Info received (Bug#1053672: Apple copyright notices in test .xlsx files) Debian Bug Tracking System
• License violations for dependencies of Rust and Go programs? John Thorvald Wodder II
  • Re: License violations for dependencies of Rust and Go programs? Paul Wise
  • Re: License violations for dependencies of Rust and Go programs? Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: License violations for dependencies of Rust and Go programs? Paul Wise
  • Re: License violations for dependencies of Rust and Go programs? John Thorvald Wodder II
  • Re: License violations for dependencies of Rust and Go programs? Mihai Moldovan
  • Re: License violations for dependencies of Rust and Go programs? Sam Hartman
  • Re: License violations for dependencies of Rust and Go programs? Mihai Moldovan
  • Re: License violations for dependencies of Rust and Go programs? Paul Wise
  • Re: License violations for dependencies of Rust and Go programs? Paul Wise
  • Re: License violations for dependencies of Rust and Go programs? John Thorvald Wodder II
  • Re: License violations for dependencies of Rust and Go programs? Paul Wise
  • Re: License violations for dependencies of Rust and Go programs? Florian Weimer
• Optymalizacja kosztów marketingu Wioletta Sadownik
• NetData violating DFSG, nonfree? Marius Gripsgard
  • Re: NetData violating DFSG, nonfree? Sam Hartman
  • Re: NetData violating DFSG, nonfree? Paul Wise
  • Re: NetData violating DFSG, nonfree? Paul Wise
  • Re: NetData violating DFSG, nonfree? Paul Wise
• Re: Re: Here manuel
• BSD-3-Clause-Attribution GPL Compatibility Richard Laager
  • Re: BSD-3-Clause-Attribution GPL Compatibility Sam Hartman

• Earlier messages