On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Jeremy Hankins wrote: > No, it doesn't. The lone JPEG is only non-free if the lossless version > is what the original author would use to make a modification to the > JPEG. If, for example, the original author threw out the lossless > version immediately on making the JPEG, that's strong evidence it's not > needed.
Not necessarily. It might be that at the time the original author had no intention of any future modifications at all. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
