Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (Mostly cut, because this is the fundamental argument:)
> Yeesh, this is like the documentation thing all over again. Are we > going to have to go through the litany of months of fruitless debates > on the issue just to establish that special pleading doesn't apply to > images either? What freedom are you trying to protect by claiming that JPEGs are not adequately modifiable? Do you wish to apply this argument to all JPEGs? -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
