Andrew Suffield wrote: > But you can approve a mangled variation on CC-BY, if you pretend that > it's really the same thing? So just 'clarify' it into the MIT > license...
Well... I'm asking about whether one can use a letter to clarify ambiguities. For example, if it's not clear exactly what is meant by "references", maybe I can say that "references" refers to "authorship references". Can I do that? Or is that the same as making a new license? I was hoping it'd be the same license, with an explanation of what those terms were meant as. I gather from your post that this isn't how a clarification letter works. :-( Best, -- Daniel Carrera | I don't want it perfect, Join OOoAuthors today! | I want it Tuesday. http://oooauthors.org | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]