Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Le dimanche 13 mars 2005 à 14:09 +0100, Måns Rullgård a écrit : >> Personally, I'd be very sceptical about releasing code under a license >> containing a blanket permission to use it under another yet to be >> written license. What if I don't at all agree with GPLv3? > > Given that the FSF has already written and recommended blatantly > non-free licenses, I generally my software under the GPL v2 only.
I usually use the MIT/X11/BSD license. I can see some situations where I might have preferred a copyleft license. However, the BSD license is simple enough that I can understand it (I think), and I don't need to worry about which libraries I link with, as long as I don't distribute binaries (which is far too cumbersome anyway). PS. Sorry for the blank mail. I slipped on the send button. -- Måns Rullgård [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
