I had hoped that a Moz Found rep would tell us we've missed some
obvious reason this doesn't hurt debian, but not yet.
With regard to the "six months" requirement, does it help to point out that CVS and other source control systems are Electronic Distribution Mechanisms? Therefore, as long as whatever system Debian keeps its Mozilla modifications in is versioned and publically available, you aren't failing to meet the requirement.
It might
be overload,
It is overload.
as basic questions from 11 Feb are unanswered yet:
can Gerv (or someone else, hey ho) tell us the opinions of the
wider Mozilla team about debian's package names, please?
I think I've already given them - we'd prefer that they be "firefox" and "thunderbird" rather than "mozilla-firefox" and "mozilla-thunderbird". Opinions differ on whether this is something we can legally require :-).
When can we expect iceweasel/FireWeb (or whatever white label browser) will be buildable from upstream sources?
We are working on it, but I can't give an ETA.
Gerv
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
