[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >In both cases, the Courts have said yes, it is text book descrimination. A >group of people is being treated differently than others. However, the Court >says that while it is descrimination, it is not prohibited descrimination. >The law itself is facially neutral and is not intended to descriminate >against anyone, even though it ends up having a disproportional result upon >certain groups. It is a question of intent. This looks like a much better rationale than the one I tried to express.
-- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
