On 30-Jan-99, 19:52 (GMT), Darren Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I thought I saw a conversation somewhere that said saying a license "is > in the public domain" isn't good enough. What is Debian's position on > this WRT the DFSG?
I've always understood that placing a (formerly/potentially) copyrighted work "in the public domain" is a statement by the author that they are giving up all copyright rights (if that's the correct phrase), and that anyone may use it in any way they please. For example, most US gov't works are public domain, presumably because the US residents taxes paid for them (yes, I know that's not universally true, that's why I wrote "most"). As always, IANAL, and I know even less about copyright in other countries than I do in the US. But I think any of the several websites that describe (US) copyright law will define public domain. Steve