Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you look into /usr/doc/texmf/latex/base/legal.txt.gz you read that > all files listed in manifest.txt must be part of this distribution. If > you look into this file, you see that all source files are listed. Then > i deduce that teTeX can't be shipped without these sources. > Am i wrong?
I don't know.. I don't have the originals and don't know the precise language. As you've stated it here the requirement is that the files be part of the distribution -- now whether debian (say, slink) would be conisdered a distribution or whether an individual package file would be considered a distribution is a question I can't address... I don't even know if it's relevant. If you can point me at some specific part of debian, I can look at its copyrights. Otherwise, I don't know what to do about all this ambiguity. -- Raul
