On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Joseph Carter wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 01:35:29PM -0700, Tom Lear wrote: > > > Also I think it would be a good thing (even if not strictly > > > required by law) to spell out explicitly that you are not > > > purporting to relicense XForms itself. > > > > Okay, I get it now. I'd suggest something like "(the XForms licence still > > applies to the xforms portions of the binary)". Just as long as it > > doesn't imply that you need to get some permission from the xforms people > > that the xforms licence hasn't already granted you. > > Should indicate the XForms license may place additional restrictions on > you and that you should read the XForms license.
Yeah, that to. - Tom