Henning Makholm wrote: > > Hmm, but it does not say "it must be made available _solely_ under > > this Agreement". > > An interesting word game, but I think that a permission to relicense > a work under arbitrary terms needs to be a little more explicit than > this.
Well... you don't _need_ permission to relicense. If a license allows redistribution, then by default you can redistribute under whatever terms you like. A license is a contract, not a property of the software. > > If the licenses are compatible in the first place, > > What do you mean, precisely, by that? That the terms of the GPL do not conflict with the requirements the IPL places on redistribution. Richard Braakman