On Jan 30, Andreas Pour wrote: > > [Personally, I think if you wrote the software yourself and link it > > against Qt, it's pretty obvious from a legal standpoint that you > > accept people linking it against Qt. > > I think so too. So why not just exclude kgv and kfloppy and distribute the > rest?
Because I'm not part of the Cabal (TINC). Seriously, it's the contrast between a meritless lawsuit and no lawsuit at all. Meritless lawsuits are expensive; we'll get back to you after we IPO. Ask the css-auth victims... (I guess I'm missing the reason why it's so hard to get people to explicitly say "you can link this against Qt"; that apparently would satisfy the FTP maintainers and let KDE 1 into contrib [and KDE 2 into main]). Chris -- ============================================================================= | Chris Lawrence | It's 2/3 of a beltway... | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.lordsutch.com/tn385/ | | | | | Open Directory Editor | Visit the Lurker's Guide to Babylon 5: | | http://dmoz.org/ | <*> http://www.midwinter.com/lurk/ <*> | =============================================================================