Marc van Leeuwen wrote: > Yet, why has nobody recently put forward this way of resolving the KDE/Qt > issue? I've seen drastic bending of the meaning of much more unambiguous parts > of the GPL. Maybe this was discussed and resolved long ago, or maybe I'm just > too blind too see the obvious? Anybody please explain.
I have put this opinion forth (that Qt is distinct from the application and not a module) in the past, but each and every time I have met with immense disagreement and vile language, so that I have become "gun shy" and have refrained from stating what I see as obvious. David Johnson