Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > I agree it is for the "non-free" archive. But does anyone see a larger > problem, which would prevent it to get into Debian?
The non-free archive is not part of Debian. -- see shy jo
- AT&T source licence? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: AT&T source licence? Henning Makholm
- Re: AT&T source licence? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: AT&T source licence? Joey Hess
- Re: AT&T source licence? David Starner
- Examples for non-freeness (Was: Re: AT&am... Juergen A. Erhard
