On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 02:32:21PM +0200, Martin Konold wrote: > Due to the fact that the GPL is according to RMS incompatible to anything > except itself
That is blatantly false, and I find it hard to believe RMS would have uttered any such statement. The MIT/X Consortium and 3-clause BSD licenses are examples of licenses that are perfectly GPL-compatible. Not to mention the LGPL. -- G. Branden Robinson | I have a truly elegant proof of the Debian GNU/Linux | above, but it is too long to fit into [EMAIL PROTECTED] | this .signature file. roger.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ |
pgpbEUZN4UoRt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
