Scripsit James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Henning> That is a very broad clause: "Recipient will .. indemnify > Henning> .. SGI from, .. any loss ... arising out of Recipient's use > Henning> .. of the Covered Code". That seems to mean that if I use > Henning> the software in a business that competes successfully with > Henning> SGI, they could sue me and demand that I pay up for their > Henning> lost profits.
> >> This reads to me just as a no warranty clause. > Henning> can you refuse that my reading is one of the cases the > Henning> language actually Henning> covers? > Actually yes. Then explain where my reasoning breaks down, please. As far as I can see, it says plain as day that if I use the program and that causes SGI to suffer any loss, I must indemnify SGI from that loss. Where am I wrong? > It looks like a standard no warranty clause. Warranty clauses normally do not have that effect. > but I don't see your reading in it. Which of the words I quoted do not come from the original clause? Which of my "..."s do you think cover somthing that makes my reading false? -- Henning Makholm "We're trying to get it into the parts per billon range, but no luck still."