Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It certainly is a clear attempt to evade the copyright on L, but that > doesn't mean it's not a successful attempt. Just because A's actions > go against the spirit of what F intended doesn't mean it's illegal. > Law has to be more precise than that.
The law looks to things like the total effect of a set of actions and the intentions of the people concerned. You are trying to treat the law as a computer program, which is simply is not. Thomas