On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 01:49:03PM +0000, Stephen Turner wrote:
> > 
> > But I am getting a bit confused here. Take the zlib licence, for example,
> > which contains the condition:
> >   3. This notice may not be removed or altered from any source distribution.
> > The FSF says that this is compatible with the GPL, but I don't understand
> > how this can be so. It imposes an extra restriction, namely the requirement
> > to reproduce the zlib copyright and licence notice, in addition to the terms
> > of the GPL. Can someone explain to me how this can be GPL-compatible?
> 
> [from clause 2 of the GPL]
>       These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole.  If
>       identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the Program,
>       and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in
>       themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those
>       sections when you distribute them as separate works.  But when you
>       distribute the same sections as part of a whole which is a work based
>       on the Program, the distribution of the whole must be on the terms of
>       this License, whose permissions for other licensees extend to the
>       entire whole, and thus to each and every part regardless of who wrote
>       it.
> 
>       Thus, it is not the intent of this section to claim rights or contest
>       your rights to work written entirely by you; rather, the intent is to
>       exercise the right to control the distribution of derivative or
>       collective works based on the Program.
> 
> The above language leads me to believe that the intent of the GPL is NOT to
> say that telling people they cannot remove the text of a copyright
> notice, or a license text that applies to a work, is not allowed.
> 

IANAL, but I disagree with your interpretation of this passage. It refers 
explicitly to "separate works". If the analog code contains chunks of zlib
code within it, then the opposite case, "part of a whole" should apply.

-- 
Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK    http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/
"This is Henman's 8th Wimbledon, and he's only lost 7 matches." BBC, 2/Jul/01

Reply via email to