"C.M. Connelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [From discussion of D] > TB> The limitation on copying fees mean that these files > TB> cannot be in Debian, but they can be in the non-free > TB> archive. > > So the restriction of a ``nominal'' or ``reasonable'' charge is > enough to cause a problem here, even if there was no real charge > being made? (I'm assuming that the problem here is with the first > clause of the DFSG,
Section one of the DFSG says you can't restrict selling. > Doesn't the GPL say pretty much the same thing in Section 3.b.? > > Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three > years, to give any third party, ***for a charge no more than > your cost of physically performing source distribution***, a > complete machine-readable copy of the corresponding source > code, to be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 > above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; > or, You don't have to abide by that section if you don't want to; that section applies only if you distribute binaries without source. Read the GPL more carefully, please. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]