On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 09:38:47AM +0100, David Carlisle wrote: > > But you have *no* way to assure this, short of trademarking the name > > "latex". > > That is a very tired argument. > Of course it is true as written, but it ignores the fact that LPPL has > been remarkably successful in its stated aims.
Why do you believe that moving these things to a separate document, asking people to do this in good faith, would be any less successful than trying to force them to in a license? If they know the license is unenforcable and/or avoidable, then they're already acting in good faith. -- Glenn Maynard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
