Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) wrote:
> > I concur with the FSF's judgment, BTW--because of the existence of the
> > filename mapping feature, the hurdle of renaming files (while
> > exceedingly obnoxious) is not so high that it renders the package
> > non-free.  
> 
> it seems like Thomas thinks that the LPPL is OK for LaTeX, but
> probably not for anything else.  That troubles me.

I think it's ok for LaTeX and for anything else for which the hurdle
of the renaming doesn't impede any real freedoms.  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to