At 04.17 +0200 2002-07-23, Jeff Licquia wrote: >On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 18:24, Lars Hellström wrote: >> At 01.31 +0200 2002-07-22, Jeff Licquia wrote: >> >Right. The question is "what modification rights do you have?" There's >> >good reason to believe that the "must change the file name" clause must >> >apply to derived works as well, so each time a file changes, its name >> >must change. >> >> The claim in that last sentence is certainly unproven, and the license text >> makes yours a highly unlikely interpretation. > >So you say. But why should I believe you? It certainly doesn't seem >unlikely to me. > >(Remember, again, that I don't care about the intent of the license. I >only care what it says.) [snip] >Again: IF THAT'S WHAT IT MEANS, THEN WHY DOESN'T IT SAY THAT???!!!???
OK, at least now you're being clear that you in this thread apparently insisted on discussing a precise text, not as elsewhere at the same time rather the intent. This has made the last few turns rather pointless. Lars Hellström -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]