On 2002-07-28 23:20:51 +0200, Lars Hellström wrote: > What license should I use if I want to make a _font_ free software?
Have a look at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OtherLicenses The Design Science License is especially interesting since it's CopyLeft plus renaming. > Originally I was thinking about the GPL, but then it occurred to me that > this could have unwanted contamination effects on documents that use the > font. Public domain wouldn't guarantee an open source status. "The aggregation of the Work with other works that are not based on the Work -- such as but not limited to inclusion in a publication, broadcast, compilation, or other media -- does not bring the other works in the scope of the License; nor does such aggregation void the terms of the License for the Work." Best regards Martin -- Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
