On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 03:23:45PM -0400, Kevin Atkinson wrote: > > I am merely quoting the closest thing to a copyright notice for all of the > > wordlist as generally required by copyright law. RMS basically said the > > word list meets FSF definition of Free (which should in term meet Debian > > guidelines). > > Meeting the FSF's definition of "free" does not always imply meeting > Debian's definition of "free", although they usually coincide. > > > That should be all that you need to know. > > Even if it was true, it still wouldn't necessarily be sufficient to > *convince* him (and d-legal) that it's correct.
RMS gave me the all clear to use it in what is now an official GNU program so that as all that I need. If you need more I suggest you talk to RMS about it. I can remove that word list from my source list but I rather not. RMS is pretty anneal about these things, please don't tell me that d-legal is more anneal than RMS because I didn't think that would be possible. --- http://kevin.atkinson.dhs.org