Scripsit Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Have I made it clear now?
Do you mean that it's the *original* work that's under a non-free license and the *translators* have havd GPL'ed their translation? *IF* that is the case, neither the original nor the translation can be in main, and there's an argument that the translation cannot be distributed at all. It is very hard to extract the raw facts of the situation from the postings that have hit debian-legal. Please summarize facts before diving into legal nitpicks. -- Henning Makholm "I, madam, am the Archchancellor! And I happen to run this University!"