On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 01:09:48AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Cc'ing debian-legal... > > tomas pospisek wrote: > > 3) The copyright seems to be fine - any comments? > > I don't think that... > > > Copyright (c) 1993 Cornell University, Kongji Huang > > All rights reserved. > > > > Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > documentation for research purposes, without fee, and without written > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > What's with non-research purposes? > > If I read the license right, this is not allowed and that is against > DFSG (6. No driscrimination against fields of endavour)...
That's correct. Debian has interpreted licenses like that as failing DFSG 6 as far as back as I can remember. -- G. Branden Robinson | When dogma enters the brain, all Debian GNU/Linux | intellectual activity ceases. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Robert Anton Wilson http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgpz2WJZFuHxg.pgp
Description: PGP signature